Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Happy Saturnalia!!

WHY DECEMBER 25TH.....??


For today's Christian, the origin of Christmas is the celebration of the birth of Jesus as recorded in the Bible. Nothing more and nothing less.

Few people realize that the origins of Christmas were pagan & celebrated in Europe & Eurasia long before anyone there had ever heard of Jesus.

Why celebrate his birthday?


Only pagans celebrated birthdays in the time of Jesus and the only mention of a birthday in the New Testament is of Herod's wife who demanded the head of John the Baptist, the cousin of Jesus, as her birthday present. Jews did not celebrate birthdays at that time, neither did the first Christians. There is no record of the early Church celebrating Christmas until at least the 3rd century.
Although it has become a most beloved holiday in modern times, there is no mention in the Bible of December 25 being the day of Jesus's Birth. The New Testament gives no date or year for Jesus’ birth. The earliest gospel – St. Mark’s, written about 65 CE – begins with the baptism of an adult Jesus. This suggests that the earliest Christians lacked interest in or knowledge of Jesus’ birthdate.

No one knows what day Jesus actually was born on.

From the biblical description, most historians believe that his birth probably occurred in September, approximately six months after Passover. One thing they agree on is that it is very unlikely that Jesus was born in December, since even the bible records shepherds tending their sheep in the fields on that night. This is quite unlikely to have happened during a cold Judean winter.

Most of what we witness on December 25th each year has absolutely nothing to do with the day of Jesus' birth, which probably occurred in late summer or early fall about 2,000 years ago. In fact, most of the customs and traditions of Christmas actually pre-date the birth of Jesus, and many of them are downright deceptive in their meaning and origin. Here are a couple examples:

In ancient Babylon, the feast of the Son of Isis (Goddess of Nature) was celebrated on December 25. Raucous partying, gluttonous eating and drinking, and gift-giving were traditions of this feast.

December 25th was also the ancient "birthday" of the son-god, Mithra, a pagan deity whose religious influence became widespread in the Roman Empire during the first few centuries A.D. Mithra was related to the Semitic sun-god, Shamash, and his worship spread throughout Asia to Europe where he was called Deus Sol Invictus Mithras. Rome was well-known for absorbing the pagan religions and rituals of its widespread empire. As such, Rome converted this pagan legacy to a celebration of the god, Saturn, and the rebirth of the sun god during the winter solstice period. The winter holiday became known as Saturnalia, and began on December 15th. The Romans held this seven-day celebration in honor of Saturn, god of agriculture. The winter solstice often fell around December 25 on the Julian calendar—following these seven days of feasting, revelry, and merrymaking. The festival was characterized by gift-giving, feasting, singing and downright debauchery, as the priests of Saturn carried wreaths of evergreen boughs in procession throughout the Roman temples. During this period, Roman schools and courts were closed, and Roman law dictated that no one could be punished for damaging property or injuring people during the week long celebration.

To commemorate the lengthening of days marked by this solstice, many Romans also enacted rituals that glorified Mithra, the god of light from ancient Persia. The origins of Mithra were older than the Romans, yet they had integrated him into their mythology nonetheless.
In January, they observed the Kalends of January, which represented the triumph of life over death. This whole season was called Dies Natalis Invicti Solis, the Birthday of the Unconquered Sun. The festival season was marked by much merrymaking. It is in ancient Rome that the tradition of the Mummers was born. The Mummers were groups of costumed singers and dancers who traveled from house to house entertaining their neighbors.

Variations of this pagan holiday flourished throughout the first few centuries after Jesus , but it probably wasn't until 336 AD that Emperor Constantine officially converted this pagan tradition into a "Christian" holiday that was first known as The Feast of Nativity in order to keep the nominal Christians as well as pagans and secular humanists happy. Constantine, himself a life-long pagan, made what I believe to be a brilliant political move in embracing Christianity throughout the Empire, and utilizing the unifying power of Jesus' message (especially to the poor) in making it the official Roman religion. As part of the transformation, Constantine ensured a more seamless transition by keeping the traditional pagan celebrations and simply giving them new Christian names. Christianity imported the Saturnalia festival hoping to take the pagan masses in with it--and they were successful. Christian leaders succeeded in converting to Christianity large numbers of pagans by promising them that they could continue to celebrate the Saturnalia as Christians. The new religion went down a bit easier, knowing that their feasts would not be taken away from them. Christians had little success, however, refining the practices of Saturnalia. As Stephen Nissenbaum, professor history at the University of Massachussetts, Amherst, writes, “In return for ensuring massive observance of the anniversary of the Savior’s birth by assigning it to this resonant date, the Church for its part tacitly agreed to allow the holiday to be celebrated more or less the way it had always been.” The earliest Christmas holidays were celebrated by drinking, rape and sexual indulgence, singing naked in the streets (a precursor of modern caroling), etc.
In 350, Pope Julius I declared that Christ’s birth would be celebrated on December 25. There is little doubt that he was trying to make it as painless as possible for pagan Romans (who remained a majority at that time) to convert to Christianity.



The Origins of Christmas Customs

A. Christmas Trees
Just as early Christians recruited Roman pagans by associating Christmas with the Saturnalia, so too worshippers of the Asheira cult and its offshoots were recruited by the Church sanctioning “Christmas Trees”.[1] Pagans had long worshiped trees in the forest, or brought them into their homes and decorated them, and this observance was adopted and painted with a Christian veneer by the Church.

B. Mistletoe
Norse mythology recounts how the god Balder was killed using a mistletoe arrow by his rival god Hoder while fighting for the female Nanna. Druid rituals use mistletoe to poison their human sacrificial victim.[2] The Christian custom of “kissing under the mistletoe” is a later synthesis of the sexual license of Saturnalia with the Druidic sacrificial cult.[3]

C. Christmas Presents
In pre-Christian Rome, the emperors compelled their most despised citizens to bring offerings and gifts during the Saturnalia (in December) and Kalends (in January). Later, this ritual expanded to include gift-giving among the general populace. The Catholic Church gave this custom a Christian flavor by re-rooting it in the supposed gift-giving of Saint Nicholas (see below).[4]

D. Santa Claus

a. Nicholas was born in Parara, Turkey in 270 CE and later became Bishop of Myra. He died in 345 CE on December 6th. He was only named a saint in the 19th century.

b. Nicholas was among the most senior bishops who convened the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE and created the New Testament. The text they produced portrayed Jews as “the children of the devil”[5] who sentenced Jesus to death.

c. In 1087, a group of sailors who idolized Nicholas moved his bones from Turkey to a sanctuary in Bari, Italy. There Nicholas supplanted a female boon-giving deity called The Grandmother, or Pasqua Epiphania, who used to fill the children's stockings with her gifts. The Grandmother was ousted from her shrine at Bari, which became the center of the Nicholas cult. Members of this group gave each other gifts during a pageant they conducted annually on the anniversary of Nicholas’ death, December 6.

d. The Nicholas cult spread north until it was adopted by German and Celtic pagans. These groups worshipped a pantheon led by Woden –their chief god and the father of Thor, Balder, and Tiw. Woden had a long, white beard and rode a horse through the heavens one evening each Autumn. When Nicholas merged with Woden, he shed his Mediterranean appearance, grew a beard, mounted a flying horse, rescheduled his flight for December, and donned heavy winter clothing.

e. In a bid for pagan adherents in Northern Europe, the Catholic Church adopted the Nicholas cult and taught that he did (and they should) distribute gifts on December 25th instead of December 6th.

f. In 1809, the novelist Washington Irving (most famous his The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Rip Van Winkle) wrote a satire of Dutch culture entitled Knickerbocker History. The satire refers several times to the white bearded, flying-horse riding Saint Nicholas using his Dutch name, “Sinter Klaas” or Santa Claus.

g. Dr. Clement Moore, a professor at Union Seminary, read Knickerbocker History, and in 1822 he published a poem based on the character Santa Claus: “Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house, not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse. The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, in the hope that Saint Nicholas soon would be there…” Moore innovated by portraying a Santa with eight reindeer who descended through chimneys.

h. The Bavarian illustrator Thomas Nast almost completed the modern picture of Santa Claus. From 1862 through 1886, based on Moore’s poem, Nast drew more than 2,200 cartoon images of Santa for Harper’s Weekly. Before Nast, Saint Nicholas had been pictured as everything from a stern looking bishop to a gnome-like figure in a frock. Nast also gave Santa a home at the North Pole, his workshop filled with elves, and his list of the good and bad children of the world. All Santa was missing was his red outfit.

i. In 1931, the Coca Cola Corporation contracted the Swedish commercial artist Haddon Sundblom to create a coke-drinking Santa. Sundblom modeled his Santa on his friend Lou Prentice, chosen for his cheerful, chubby face. The corporation insisted that Santa’s fur-trimmed suit be bright, Coca Cola red. And Santa was born – a blend of Christian crusader, pagan god, and commercial idol.

E. Rudolph

In 1939, Robert May, an advertising agent working for the Montgomery Ward department store, developed Rudolf, the ninth, red-nosed reindeer as a highly lucrative sales ploy. Santa Claus and his reindeer did much to advance the capitalistic interests of the commercial sector, and in-store displays featuring Santa became common place.

F. The Yule Log

The Yule log came from Scandinavian mythology. The winter months were long and hard, so a huge tree was found, cut down, hauled into the house, and lit afire in honor of Thor, the Viking god of war. It was believed that Thor would bless them with prosperity during the following year in reward for this ceremony held during Yule, which is the Anglo-Saxon word for the months of December and January. The Anglo-Saxons called December “the former Yule” and January “the after Yule.” When most of the Scandinavians converted to Christianity, the burning of the Yule log became a part of the Christmas celebration, and the word Yule became synonymous with Christmas. The burning of the Yule log is still practiced today, though it is more prominent in European celebrations and has lost its Scandinavian meaning except with the handful of neo-pagans who seek to revive the old ways.


Happy Holidays!!!


Sources

[1] Clement Miles, Christmas Customs and Traditions: Their History and Significance, New York: Dover Publications, 1976, pp. 178, 263-271.

[2] Miles, p. 273.

[3] Miles, p. 274-5.

[4] Miles, pp. 276-279.

[5] John 8:44



Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Bill Ayers

It seems, based on conversations amongst my friends, family, associates, and various message boards I am a member of, that I need spend some time (serious time) de-bunking what I like to call:
"The Obama bullshit machine"

Chapter 1 - Bill Ayers.

*sigh*



People on the right are having a ball accusing Obama of "palling around with terroristS" (plural). These "people" include, but are not limited to, Faux "News" and the Republican Presidential ticket itself.
Let's forget for a second that they refer to "terroristS" (I guess "pals around with a terrorist--singular" isn't scary enough), and instead examine who, exactly, is William Ayers.........the linchpin of this bullshit claim.









William Charles Ayers (born December 26, 1944) is an American elementary education theorist and former 1960s anti-war activist. He is known for the radical nature of his activism in the 1960s and 1970s as well as his current work in education reform, curriculum, and instruction. In 1969 he co-founded the radical left organization the Weather Underground, which conducted a campaign of bombing public buildings during the 1960s and 1970s. He is now a professor in the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, holding the titles of Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar.

By his own admission in his 2001 book Fugitive Days, Ayers participated in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, the United States Capitol building in 1971, and The Pentagon in 1972. No one was killed or hurt in the bombings that Ayers participated in, as warning were delivered ahead of each blast. It appears that the intention of each was property damage. Ayers writes:
"Although the bomb that rocked the Pentagon was itsy-bitsy - weighing close to two pounds - it caused 'tens of thousands of dollars' of damage. The operation cost under $500, and no one was killed or even hurt."[Bill Ayers, Fugitive Days, pg. 261]

Because of a water leak caused by the Pentagon bombing, aerial bombardments during the Vietnam War had to be halted for several days. I would venture to guess that this was the intended consequence of the actions of the Weather Underground.

Bill Ayers has never been convicted of a crime. Period. In 1973, the federal government requested the dismissal of the charges against Ayers and his future wife Bernadine Dohrn in the interest of national security following accusations of government misconduct.

He is a respected and tenured Professor of Education. He has come so far from his radical anti-war past that in 1997 Chicago awarded him its Citizen of the Year award for his work on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a grant proposal that in 1995 won $49.2 million over five years for public school reform. McCain supporters have denounced Ayers as an "unrepentant terrorist", but no less then William C. Ibershof (the lead federal prosecutor in the case against Ayers in 1973) said he believes people deserve a chance to redeem themselves, "a human reaction anyone would have."

Obama meets Bill Ayers

The two men first met in 1995, when Obama was tapped to chair the board of the newly formed Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Ayers was instrumental in creating the organization, which was to dispense grants for projects that would improve Chicago's schools.
The Challenge was one of 18 projects supported by a $500 million grant announced at a White House ceremony Dec. 18, 1993, by the Annenberg Foundation, founded four years earlier by Philadelphia publisher Walter Annenberg. It was the largest single gift ever made to public education in America. The Chicago project received a $49.2 million grant in 1995, and officials administering the grant funds at Brown University announced at the time that the Chicago proposal was developed through discussions among “a broad-based coalition of local school council members, teachers, principals, school reform groups, union representatives and central office staff” convened by three educators – one of whom was Ayers. Mayor Richard M. Daley, a Democrat, and Gov. Jim Edgar, a Republican, took part in a ceremony announcing the grant.

The Chicago Tribune, after examining the Annenberg records, said they showed Ayers and Obama "attended board meetings, retreats and at least one news conference together as the education program got under way." It also said Obama and Ayers "continued to attend meetings together during the 1995-2001 operation of the program." According to the New York Times, the documents show the two attended just six board meetings together, Obama as chairman and Ayers to inform the board on grantees and other issues.
(In a press release, the McCain campaign puts the number of meetings at seven, 5 of them in 1995, 1 in 1996 & 1 in 1997.)





"He launched his political career in the guy's living room"


The same year the two men met through the Annenberg Challenge, Ayers hosted a meet-and-greet coffee for Obama, who was already running for state Senate and who lived three blocks away from him. Read that again--Obama was already running for state Senate when Ayers hosted the meet-and-greet.

Obama and Ayers also were on the board of an antipoverty charity, the Woods Fund of Chicago, where their service overlapped from 2000 to 2002. And Ayers contributed $200 to Obama's campaign for the Illinois state Senate on March 2, 2001.
That's it--200 bucks.

Wow.

Ayers has never endorsed Obama.
Obama has never endorsed Ayers.
Ayers does not advise Obama on policy of any kind.
Ayers does not advise Obama on anything. Indeed, since their Woods Fund days, their interactions have been sporadic (at best) and accidental. Ayers and Obama have not spoken on the phone or exchanged e-mails since Obama began serving in the U.S. Senate in January 2005, and last met more then a year ago when they bumped into each other on the street in Hyde Park (their neighborhood in Chicago).



"He's a terrorist"

That, I suppose, would depend on how you define "terrorist".
Ayers himself doesn't see himself that way:
"We weren't terrorists," Ayers told an interviewer for the Chicago Tribune in 2001. "The reason we weren't terrorists is because we did not commit random acts of terror against people. Terrorism was what was being practiced in the countryside of Vietnam by the United States."

Like I said--it depends on how you define terrorist. Here is how Dictionary.com defines it:

TER*ROR*IST
-Noun
1. a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others.
3. (formerly) a member of a political group in Russia aiming at the demoralization of the government by terror.
4. an agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France.
Adjective
5. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of terrorism or terrorists: terrorist tactics.

Of all of these definitions, only #1 applies........and only partially. Why only partially? Because Ayers clearly does not advocate terrorism; his own or others:
In a letter to the editor in the Chicago Tribune, Ayers wrote, "I condemn all forms of terrorism — individual, group and official". He also condemned the September 11th attacks in that letter. "Today we are witnessing crimes against humanity on our own shores on an unthinkable scale, and I fear that we may soon see more innocent people in other parts of the world dying in response."
You can make the argument that Bill Ayers "used" terrorism in that he bombed building with the intent of causing property damage.......but I think it is a stretch to equate blowing up an empty bathroom in the Pentagon with strapping 5lbs of C-4 to your body and detonating in a crowded marketplace.

Is Bill Ayers a terrorist?? Absolutely not. That question implies present tense.

Was he a terrorist when he was part of the Weather Underground? If he qualifies for that titled, it is tenuous as best....


"TerroristS"

I have yet to hear any others examples to make up the terroristS, plural.....so let me borrow a page from the Dubya Doctrine and offer a pre-emptive strike:

"Obama was endorsed by the KKK!"
-Total bullshit. Easily disproven with a 10-second trip to Snopes.com

"Obama was endorsed by Hamas!"
-Questionable, at best. Ahmed Yousef, Hamas' chief political adviser, has in fact spoken highly of Obama and expressed hope that he will win the election. In an April 2008 interview with WABC Radio in New York, Yousef was asked whether he thought the Palestinian prime minister would be willing to meet with Obama and Clinton before the election. He responded:
Yousef: "We don't mind. Actually, we like Mr. Obama, and we hope he will [inaudible] the election. I do believe he is like John Kennedy, a great man with great principles, and he has a vision to change America, to make it in a position to lead the world community, but not with domination and arrogance."
(Yousef is often quoted as saying "we hope he will win the election," but this part of the audio is garbled. "We hope he will win" is a reasonable interpretation.)

Whether this constitutes a political endorsement is debatable, as Yousef is in no position to vote for Obama himself, nor did he recommend that others vote for him.
And endorsements are usually sought-after and greatly publicized, whereas Obama has in no way welcomed Yousef's supposed endorsement.

Also, saying that Hamas supports Obama is not saying that Obama supports Hamas, or that he would acquiesce to the group's demands as president. Indeed, Obama has explicitly condemned Hamas. When former president Jimmy Carter met with Hamas leaders in April, Obama criticized his decision, saying that "we must not negotiate with a terrorist group intent on Israel's destruction." And both Obama and McCain were among 90 cosponsors of the 2006 Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act, which would make it U.S. policy to "urge members of the international community to avoid contact with and refrain from financially supporting the terrorist organization Hamas until it agrees to recognize Israel, renounce violence, disarm and accept prior agreements." Obama has said many times that he would not meet or negotiate with Hamas as president, and he has criticized McCain for implying otherwise. "To engage in that kind of smear," he told CNN in a May 8 interview, "is unfortunate, particularly since my policy toward Hamas has been no different than his."
[factcheck.org]

"Obama has been endorsed by Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam!!"
-See above. While it is true that Farrakhan endorsed Obama, Obama himself rejected that endorsement, and has been a consistent denunciator of Louis Farrakhan.

Hey.....did you hear that Jeffrey Dahmer endorsed Ronald Reagan?? That's because even if he did--who gives a shit??











Tuesday, October 7, 2008

4 weeks out.....

Today is Tuesday, October 7th 2008. We are now exactly 4 weeks away from the 2008 Presidential election.

Many people are calling this the "most important" Presidential election of our time. I disagree, as I believe 2004 was of immense importance (way to go, America), and--in retrospect--2000 was the most important election of my lifetime.

This is the way I see it, and have seen it for some time:
-People will vote for McCain because they have been made to be afraid not to.
-People will vote for Obama because they are hopeful that he can deliver on his promise of change.

I am voting for Obama.


At this point, even incremental change is positive change........as we are rapidly approaching rock bottom under BushCorp.



This is my 1st blog entry, ever. I plan to be active....and I will go back to edit and update.





Coming soon:
"Why am I angry?"